FAQ: Ward Violations

Question: “What is a Ward Violation?”

Answer:  Without getting too technical, a Ward violation (Ward v. USPS, 111 FMSR 183   (Fed. Cir. 02/17/11) occurs when a deciding official considers information not previously noticed to the employee via the proposal notice. In such an instance, it is a due process violation. This is a very serious deficiency entitling the employee to a corrected adverse action proceeding.  It can even result in extensive attorney fee awards (once case resulted in a $300,000 award in 2012).

Most union representatives will instinctively think a Ward violation is equivalent to the deciding official considering a prior disciplinary action outside the proposal notice.  This is true.  However, it can go further.  For example, a deciding official talking to supervisors about a pattern of behavior not noticed to the employee would qualify as a violation.  Of course, the existing standard of “new and material” information considered by a deciding official also continues to apply.  Typically, the existence of these types of violations only emerge in testimony and it is thus important for a representative to effectively question a deciding official before the judge. Conversely, agency consultants must advise deciding officials to not engage in a Ward violation and limit the scope of their consideration to information expressly contained in the proposed action.

See All Our FAQ’s

Are you facing a hostile work environment, workplace discrimination, or proposed removal?

Phone: (202) 642-1287
Website: informedfed.com
Twitter: @InformedFed
Our Consulting Services
Hire a Consultant
Informed Fed provides expert administrative consulting services to employees and labor organizations in public sector labor and employee relations matters. At a fraction of the cost of attorneys, and with senior level practitioner expertise, our experts can assist you in arbitration, grievance, FLRA, OSC, MSPB, OSHA, OWCP, EEO, and Alternative Dispute Resolution matters. We also provide direct consultation, IT support, and training to labor organizations. Contact us for a free consultation and case assessment.
The material on this website is intended to provide only general information and comment to the public. Although we make our best efforts to ensure information found on this website is accurate and timely, we cannot, and do not, guarantee the information is either. Nor do we guarantee accuracy of any information contained on websites to which our website provide links.  Do not, under any circumstances, rely on information found on our website as legal advice. It should be considered a general guide. Legal matters are often complicated and fact dependent. For assistance with your specific issue or inquiry please contact your local union, personnel office, or attorney. Consultants offered through this website are not attorneys and are not employees of Informed Fed. They are labor and employee relations practitioners. They provide services to clients in their individual capacities through individual agreements with their clients. Though attorneys are not required for representation in administrative matters or proceedings, there are instances in which our consultants may refer you to attorneys or otherwise make such recommendation. In no instance does this site, or consultants associated with this site, infer the provision of legal services.

1 comment for “FAQ: Ward Violations

  1. January 13, 2014 at 3:10 am

    USPS BASICALLY TOLD ME IT HAD NO LIGHT DUTY WORK ME ALTHOUGH IT HAD PROVIDED ME LIGHT DUTY WORK FOR MANY YEARS. I AM A PREFERIABLE ELIGIBLE VETERAN. IS USPB CORRECT?

Comments are closed.